The Wrecking Ball of a News
Miley Cyrus’s recent revelation that she once recorded drug purchases as “vintage clothes” on her financial records may have seemed like a casual anecdote. However, for finance professionals, this admission signals serious concerns about financial governance, ethical oversight, and compliance.
This incident is not just a celebrity misstep—it is a pertinent case study on the risks of financial misrepresentation, and a reminder of the professional standards required in the management of high-profile finances
@mondial
1. Tracking and Categorizing AI Expenses
Granular cost tracking is essential for responsible AI spending. Rather than treating AI as a black-box IT project, forward-thinking organizations break down expenses into clearly defined categories:
- Hardware and infrastructure: Specialized resources (like GPUs and high-performance servers) form a significant portion of AI budgets. Projections estimate that data centers could require nearly $6.7 trillion in capital outlays by 2030, with $5.2 trillion tied directly to AI workloads. This scale makes it vital to monitor hardware use and properly amortize costs across projects.
- Software licenses and cloud services: Subscription-based platforms (for model training, vector databases, or AI-as-a-service) typically qualify as recurring operational expenditures (OpEx). Perpetual software licenses (CapEx) involve large upfront payments plus ongoing costs for maintenance and upgrades, while software-as-a-service (SaaS) subscriptions spread costs over time and often include support and updates.
- Data acquisition and management: Building robust AI models requires access to large, quality datasets. Costs here include data labeling, synthetic data generation, third-party data subscriptions, as well as investment in tools for data governance and privacy compliance.
- Personnel and development: Salaries for data scientists, machine learning engineers, and domain experts frequently outpace software and hardware costs. In some analyses, AI budgets are primarily allocated to hardware, R&D personnel, and energy use. Training advanced models (like GPT-3) can cost upwards of $12 million, with costs increasing substantially each year.
- Training and fine-tuning: Large models require intensive training cycles. Newer advancements can reduce these costs significantly, but finance teams must still keep careful track of GPU hours and energy consumption.
- Maintenance, monitoring, and compliance: Ongoing expenses include retraining models, MLOps tooling, security audits, compliance with data privacy, and updating for regulatory changes. Upskilling staff in AI also falls under this category.
Allocating costs by department (e.g., IT, R&D, operations, marketing, customer service) helps finance teams measure the ROI of AI initiatives. Whether AI is used to cut service center headcount or improve manufacturing with predictive maintenance, visibility into spending clarifies which applications drive value. Recent surveys show a surge in active AI expense management, with more organizations now applying FinOps-style cost allocation and forecasting to AI and SaaS.
2. Financial Reporting: OpEx vs CapEx
Traditional accounting separates capital expenditures (CapEx) and operational expenditures (OpEx), but AI blurs these lines. Machine-learning models are intangible but require both upfront and ongoing investments.
- SaaS and cloud services as OpEx: Increasingly, companies classify AI subscriptions, cloud computing, and software licenses as operating expenses. These tools are typically priced monthly/annually, include upgrades and support, and prevent large upfront costs, providing flexibility to scale usage as needed.
- Infrastructure and perpetual licenses as CapEx: Organizations with in-house AI systems may buy GPUs, servers, and perpetual software licenses—capitalized on the balance sheet and depreciated over years. However, perpetual licenses also introduce hidden expenses (support, maintenance, security). Many companies therefore favor cloud-based options even if per-unit costs are higher in the long run.
Modern financial reporting standards emphasize greater transparency. Tools powered by AI can automatically match receipts, categorize transactions, and flag anomalies. Case studies show that AI-driven expense management automates approvals and detects irregularities, helping companies reduce fraud and speed up financial closing.
3. Cost Optimization and Efficiency
AI is both a cost center and a potential source of efficiency. Adopting FinOps (financial operations) frameworks enables companies to analyze cloud usage and optimize resources:
- Workload optimization and waste reduction: Top priorities include monitoring GPU utilization, scheduling training during off-peak hours, and rightsizing hardware, which cuts waste—critical as AI-driven compute demand may nearly triple by 2030.
- Automation and anomaly detection: AI reduces administrative burden by providing real-time visibility into spending, improving cash flow forecasting, and reducing manual, error-prone data entry.
FinOps for AI stresses the importance of understanding and quantifying costs before optimizing. Tracking usage sets the stage for effective negotiation with vendors and more precise cost control.
AI can also optimize costs outside IT. For example, many companies now leverage AI for business travel management and expense software, automating report creation and compliance to keep spending in check. Increasingly, organizations are adopting AI solutions to automatically adjust allowances and enforce policies.
4. Strategic Alignment and ROI Measurement
As AI investments grow, CFOs must align spending with clear strategic outcomes. While nearly all large companies intend to increase AI investment, very few feel they’ve reached AI maturity—highlighting the pressing need for disciplined ROI measurement:
- Cost–benefit analysis: Comparing recurring licensing fees against benefits (like reduced fraud or improved traffic flow) helps organizations prioritize high-value use cases and justify investment.
- ROI models: These should capture both direct (e.g., productivity boost, sales lift) and indirect benefits (e.g., better decision-making, customer satisfaction). Examples show that automating expense management not only increases efficiency but can also improve financial health by freeing up working capital.
- Risk and governance: Factoring in compliance, security, and governance costs is vital. New regulations (e.g., the EU’s AI Act) may introduce steep fines for non-compliance, pushing companies to budget for related oversight and audits. As AI provider costs rise, organizations may need to explore grants, partnerships, and staged rollouts to spread expenses.
Organizational readiness is another priority: While many employees are eager to use AI, concerns about accuracy and cybersecurity persist. Collaboration across IT, operations, HR, and risk ensures AI is both effective and responsible, with governance structures like AI ethics committees providing oversight.
5. Common Tools and Emerging Trends
Numerous AI-driven expense management platforms are gaining popularity:
- Integrated tools automate workflows, consolidate financial data, and provide real-time expense visibility.
- Corporate cards can auto-categorize purchases and match receipts to transactions, reducing manual input.
- AI-enabled platforms now handle HR, payroll, receipts, and invoice processing automatically, enforcing spending rules and flagging outliers.
FinOps platforms combine visibility with optimization, automatically adjusting or resizing cloud resources and monitoring usage for granular cost allocation. As AI adoption expands, FinOps responsibilities are extending to AI and machine-learning, demanding new technical and financial expertise.
Cloud-based accounting systems support dynamic cost allocation and real-time reporting. Surveys suggest that almost all top-performing companies plan to boost cloud investments—primarily to facilitate scalable AI capabilities. Modern cloud platforms help finance teams allocate expenses and measure AI ROI.
Emerging trends include:
- Dynamic pricing and consumption-based models: Vendors increasingly offer AI training/inference on a usage basis, aligning spend with business value but requiring strong monitoring.
- Open-source and smaller models: These offer cost savings, with lightweight architectures delivering strong performance for lower compute and energy outlays.
- Composability and modularity: As AI workloads become more modular, finance teams must understand each module’s cost and negotiate multi-vendor agreements.
- Environmental concerns: Sustainability is becoming central to AI investment decisions, with companies investing in energy-efficient data centers or offsets to meet ESG commitments.
Key Takeaways for CFOs and Accountants
This case provides important lessons for CFOs, controllers, and financial advisors:
- Maintain Professional Skepticism: Do not accept vague or implausible expense classifications without adequate documentation and justification.
- Ensure Comprehensive Documentation: Detailed, verifiable records serve as protection during audits and investigations.
- Clarify Ambiguous Categories: Areas like travel, wardrobe, and gifts require consistent policy application and thorough review.
- Support Client Well-Being, Maintain Standards: Encourage clients facing personal challenges to seek help, but do not compromise professional and ethical standards.
Rethinking Moment
AI’s evolution into a core operational expense means CFOs and finance leaders must rethink how they manage, classify, and report these costs. Detailed tracking—by hardware, software, data, personnel, and maintenance—is now a necessity. The classification of AI costs matters: cloud-based services are generally OpEx, while on-premise hardware may be CapEx, but even SaaS can snowball if not strictly managed.
Cost optimization, using FinOps principles, helps organizations gain visibility and eliminate waste, while AI-powered automation simplifies expense management. Leading companies are fully integrating AI into business strategy, expanding both AI and cloud budgets as part of a long-term vision.
Ultimately, responsible AI expense management requires balancing innovation with governance, incorporating compliance and sustainability into ROI calculations, and preparing for a future where vendor pricing will likely increase. By embracing transparency, automation, and strategic alignment, organizations can extract value from AI while maintaining financial discipline and earning stakeholder trust.
Your next steps...
💡Click here to ensure data residency, compliance and reduce time spent on period-end reporting.
🔋Click here if you wish to solve 25+ Spreadsheet reporting issues without losing the spreadsheets.
🔆 Click here to improve the accuracy and usability of generated financial reports.
💯 Click here to decrease risk by providing on-demand access to the transaction detail behind every reported balance
☎️ Book a free, no-obligation walkthrough with Mondial to see how we can help you in financial reporting and consolidations just like one of our successful clients.
